Pipher posits that writing for change serves as an invitation to debate, while propaganda serves as a powerful carpet bomb of responses. This is something I can completely agree with. Change writing can be the source of critical thinking, while propaganda is the blatant hammering of views on those who have their intellectual guard down. Writing that causes change (change writing) will contain the presentation of a topic and many of its facets, pros and cons. Writing that propagates change (propaganda) will contain a one-sided presentation of a usually offensive topic, and is designed with a specific, unethical persuasion in