In "Business for the Glory of God: The Bible's Teaching on the Moral Goodness of Business" by Grudem (2003) the writer tries to create a treatise in which he aims to establish a divine moral foundation for our current economic system. However, in his seventh chapter “Inequality of possessions” he presents us, at best, with an incomplete analysis, conditioned by a subjective interpretation of the Bible which fears to fully develop what can be deduced from its rational application to the socio-economic history of the humanity. to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay From the beginning the author undertakes to imperfectly justify material inequality based on a narrow interpretation of the divine law of cause and effect: karma – or God's sense of justice in which, according to him, a person is given according to his ability to possess and command. To begin with, fairness of reward is not always exemplified by our current economic system, which rather than being ordained by God, appears to be the result of humanity's habit and desire for power turning into a historical mental construct based on axiomatic abstractions derived from greater ontological principles inherent to all the divine value of humanity in our connection with God and in service to God. And which is thus, in fact, corrupted and degraded by an unjust economic system that neglects to consider both the social ones and personal ones that go beyond any sense of material administration, which the author attributes to God but then does not recognize that this idea, if taken to its most distant consequences, implies that evil is the result of an express divine will, as it is often influenced by a person's economic situation and ability to experience and express love in their life. Furthermore, in his inferences from Paul's interjections in the Bible at the beginning of the chapter, Grudem does not fully extract the idea that more than a material reward, we must receive there in heaven a retribution of spiritual connotation which is not presupposed by a sense of satisfaction earthly which is often socially signified in a person's ability to possess. Furthermore, our ability to own and manage our assets is not and has never been concomitant with our sense of happiness and divine fulfillment, since the latter derives from deeper spiritual truths not present in the world's socioeconomic systems; truths about the value of life based on a willing spirit of surrender to a greater sense of self – namely God – which requires us to let go of our often partial and incomplete notions – desires/possessions – of what is good and evil ; for one person's heaven can clearly be another's hell, and many times throughout history our most talented souls have lived simple lives and died poor, and yet happy in God and for God, or vice versa. However, further down in his analysis, Grudem W. (2003) states that “it is a great mistake to call this – referring to the biblical passage in (Acts 4:32-35) – early communism. (p. 2) and then proceeds to describe the reasons why such egalitarian sentiment is not indicative of communism, despite obvious similarities to the original Marxist idea outside of its historical realizations by imperfect and authoritarian control agencies: the government. However, in doing so, the author misses the point that rather than a total change in our current economic modus operandi, what the Bible indicates is an openness to current reforms that can be applied to alleviate inequality. economy in our country. company, which.