The argument presented in Stuart Sim's Manifesto for Silence is to campaign for conflict against noise and the preservation of silence. Stuart Sim writes that silence helps us maintain our humanity and sense of self, explaining how noise pollution is responsible for silence's victimization of our quality of life. Sim uses various methods to convey this message to his readers in a way that makes it easy to understand and follow. He lays out his argument and provides support for credibility. It also allows the introduction of adverse points of view to respond to, thus strengthening his ideas. Furthermore, it even goes as far as offering corrective actions to resolve the issue. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Sim introduces the topic of his argument by providing background on the destructive nature of noise pollution. He believes the noise is directly related to technological advances in modern advertising. Providing evidentiary support that as technosciences continue to thrive, so does our ability to think and function entirely as we humanly should. This brings out the importance of Sim's campaign to silence the threat to our sense of humanity... pun intended. Sim refers to the root of the problem as technology. He goes on to support his claim that, due to a combination of technological advances and corporate ambitions, advertising has earned its place as the “worst culprit” in the assault on silence. Not only that, the health of our physical, spiritual and mental states is at stake due to the weapon of sound. Sound bombs are considered inhumane and ideologically intimidating. Sim's "Shock and Awe" factor proved to be a real problem. Sim intelligently develops his argument intellectually and methodically for the reader. He asks prying questions, leaving the field open for self-evaluation; wondering whether it is worth living in a noisy society and at the same time gaining corporate superiority. Are we willing to take this risk at the expense of ruining the "natural rhythms" of our human existence? Along with his interrogation strategy, he introduces counterarguments and evidence. He observes that technology is a positive indicator of evolutionary achievements in society and that silence also has its drawbacks. This method allows Sim to rebut with empowering arguments, such as discussing how these technological achievements have caused more harm than help and deeming them "inhumane". He counters the failures of silence with a study in a hospital, proving that silence has healing qualities. Furthermore, Sim's action plans to alleviate the problem are evident. On the issue of outward silence he cites a credible recommendation to apply the “60/60” rule to avoid pain. For a broader remedy against noise pollution, it refers to “Operation Silent Night” to control unnecessary noise and adds the legislative efforts of the Noise Abatement Act. Regarding internal noise, it encourages using silence for deeper thought and exploration of our personal identity. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The meaning of Sim's thesis proclaims that noise pollution is the adversary of silence. He insists on the idea that silence is more of a need than a desire for both a functional society and a solid sense of humanity. He states that silence.