“Modernity has long been haunted, perhaps even defined, by its epistemic insecurity, clinging to great truths that ultimately disappoint as our world becomes less and less knowable. New knowledge and new ways of understanding simultaneously produce new forms of unknowing, new uncertainties and mysteries. The scientific method, based on deduction and falsifiability, is more effective in proliferating questions than in answering them. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay For example, Einstein's theories about the curvature of space and motion at the quantum level provide new knowledge and generate new unknowns that could not be pondered before. Over time it has been seen that the best theories have turned out to be incomplete. Theories could explain many phenomena using a few basic principles, predict new results but sooner or later new and more precise experiments show a discrepancy between the functioning of nature and the predictions of these theories. It may seem that the theories were not 'accurate' in the beginning but we cannot deny the fact that the theories at the time were a very good approximation of the truth or reality that they set out to understand and know. In physics, Newtonian models were crude approximations of the truth. Similarly, in Biology the Mendelian process turned out to be an even greater simplification of reality than Newton's laws. The discovery of gene-protein interactions and other aspects of epigenetics has challenged the view of DNA as destiny and even introduced evidence that the environment can influence inherited traits, something once considered a genetic impossibility. The more we learn in any area of Knowledge, in Evolutionary Biology, for example, the further we move away from a model capable of explaining it. Physicists have long struggled with ignorance about disorder in the atmosphere, in the turbulent sea, in the fluctuations of wildlife populations, in the oscillations of the heart and the brain: the irregular, nonlinear, erratic and discontinuous side. And where classical science ends, chaos begins. “Relativity eliminated the Newtonian illusion of absolute space and time; Quantum theory eliminated the Newtonian dream of a controllable measurement process; Chaos eliminated the Laplacian fantasy of deterministic predictability. In the field of psychology, the Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with low ability suffer from illusory superiority, incorrectly evaluating their own cognitive ability as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority arises from the metacognitive inability of people with low abilities to recognize their own ineptitude; without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence. As described by social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, the cognitive bias of illusory superiority arises from an internal illusion in people with low ability and from an external misperception in people with high ability; that is, "the miscalibration of the incompetent results from a mistake about oneself, while the miscalibration of the highly competent results from a mistake about others." In contrast, highly competent individuals may mistakenly assume that tasks that are easy for them to perform are also easy for other people to perform, or that other people have a similar understanding of topics in which they themselves are experts. understand the molecules that make up the device and its structure? If we had a way.
tags