John Searle's book "Mind" has an important influence on the idea of ​​rational action and provides suggestions regarding the question of free will. The book also symbolizes a change in John's imagination since he published the book with the title The Rediscovery of the Mind, in the year 1992. It illustrates how consciousness causes certain thoughts to happen in an inexplicable way considering the reactions of neurons. present in humans (Searle, 1992). In his book, he suggests the possibility of a non-human concept and how the system can cause humans to act in a certain way or cause certain things to occur (Searle, 2004). The main focus of the book is on what Searle calls a conventional model of the human point of view and the rationality of human ways of constructing alternative models. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay According to Searle, the focus in the classical model is related to the thought that various actions of human beings are caused by the desires and beliefs of different people. Searle suggests that the desires or ultimate desires of human beings are not exposed to rational limitations and that the fact is that desires are subject to rationality in the concrete reasoning that a matter leads to the satisfaction of human desires. Other segments of the classic model are; firstly, rationality is influenced by following rules, secondly, it is that desires should be consistent and thirdly, willpower can only emerge where the psychological events of actions are incorrect (Searle, 2004) . In the Book of Seals, he discusses these classical models in the first chapter and argues against them in the usual blunt and blunt manner. Searle introduces how the book's main concern illustrates how assumptions and variations in decision making are a matter of decision making assumptions subject to different reasons (Searle, 1992). He explains his point of view on the issue of decision making and how alternative theories are crucial to justify the theories regarding decision making and the ideologies behind the issue. The basic arrangement of intentions, actions and ideas is discussed in chapter two of the book which lays some foundation for this originality. The chapter actually points out that the gaps in various efforts regarding satisfactions and the direction of acceptance revolve around three main gaps. The first atonement consists of the prior intentions to act and the reasons behind the acts, the second of prior motivations to act and intentions of the actions, and the third motivation behind the intentions to act and means to carry out the intended action to the end (Searle, 2004). Chapter three of Searle's book is a continuation of chapter two which discusses the expected gaps. The chapter illustrates that the intelligence behind what happens within the empty spaces comprises a complex non-human impression of self-being. This impression requires awareness, frequent persistence over time, operating under certain constraints of discretion, human idea of ​​deciding to initiate and implement certain actions under the presumption of free will, as well as taking responsibility for some actions already undertaken (Searle, 2004). According to Searle, there is no justification for the actions taken by various people in different circumstances and the gaps explained do not provide a reason for determining the actions nor provide sufficient clarification on them. Chapter four of Searle's book illustrates rational structures of reasons. He argues that, among other things, they possess propositional agreements and must be related toreasons why they are conceived. Finally, if among other things they are to engage in intermediate deliberation and justify action, they must participate in the entire justification process. However, if the reflection is to be rational, the leading should not differ from reasons coming from external agents but rather believe and recognize the essential reasons. The chapter goes on to explain that actions must involve at least some elements that act as motivators towards the action and the motivation can be internal, such as desires, or external such as desire, need or obligations to perform the action (Searle, 1992). Therefore, rationality in decision making involves recognizing key motivators and evaluating their comparative weights, appreciating and judging significant non-motivational details, as well as justifying those motives to explain certain reasons for actions.Chapter Five and six of Searle's book explains the reasons behind certain actions. The author develops an argument that there are reasons that the majority may not want. Some motivators neither determine nor fulfill obligations. He argues that the use of language involves a commitment to its broad applications and that it is applicable to oneself and others. For example, when it comes to a personal desire to earn or obtain something, the need should extend to what others want or desire in a similar situation (Szasz, 2002). Accordingly, if my desires are determined by other people's efforts to realize them, then it is obvious that one should be motivated to help others satisfy their needs and Searle argues this fact in this chapter. Searle goes on to mention that desires are personal and that everyone develops them and strives to achieve them, thus justifying that actions are driven by personal people since desires do not come from external sources but from deep within human beings (Searle, 2004). Chapter seven of the book explains Searle's position regarding the various models. For example, he points out that the classical model does not take into account the will and how weakness of the will affects action. Chapter eight illustrates a clear message that there is no reasonable logic for real reasoning. In his book he reveals his position by contrasting between the rational relation between properties and the relation between rational constraints on belief. In chapter 9 of the book Searle explains his point of view on the question of free will. It implies that the reality of life gaps and certain actions leads to psychological problems. Explain that the entire specification of psychological concerns is not sufficient to determine the outcome. He argues that the gap in real life, regarding free will, is not related to neurobiological facts. Indeed, the question of the relationship between neurobiological facts and how this Couse efficiency in humans remains unanswered since the whole question is complex (Szasz, 2002). Simply put, Searle's book is simple and characteristically clear considering his arguments regarding specific issues such as free will and causation of actions are the main themes running through the entire book. His argument is persuasive and justifiable in the way he explains his point of view on the issue. However, his arguments may not be in harmony with various points of view because there must be different opinions and reasons regarding the issue. Because he makes assumptions or presents his ideas about commitments as internal motivations, his feelings do not fully answer the question of how commitments and recognition determine motivations for actions. It is not clear whether the concept of generality of language and the way.