Shaw, in his adolescence, was when one rainy morning, when he crossed the line of a Utah highway, hitting a car carrying two scientists, James Furfaro and Keith O'Dell, who was going to work nearby. Both men were killed. Shaw says he was texting his girlfriend at the time. He is later seen taking part in something almost inconceivable. She enters the scene where the accident occurred and meets one of the scientists' daughters, where she had been interviewed, and receives a warm, sincere, tearful hug from that woman. . Reggie Shaw has had a long, hard journey from being a reckless killer to being one of the nation's most powerful spokesmen on the dangers of texting and driving. It was first brought to attention by Matt Richtel, a reporter for the New York Times, who had a series of articles on distracted driving that also won a Pulitzer Prize. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Now, five years later, the book "A Deadly Wandering" has been written, Richtel gives Shaw's story the emotional treatment it needed, delving into details about the science behind distracted driving. Continually, Richtel's widely reported book deserves a place alongside a book like To Kill a Mockingbird in American high school curricula. High school students of this generation need this kind of book to influence them and push them to save a life or two. What makes the people who died in this book so different and poignant is how ordinary they are. Two men get up early in the morning to go to work, they get behind the wheel, a stranger loses track of his car and they crash. The two men die. There's a possible temptation to make the accident seem more dramatic than it actually was, to give it meaning, which is why Richtel wonders whether Reggie lied about being texting while driving. In short, he breaks down the chapters of the book and Richtel reconnects them and connects them to the history of cognitive neuroscience. From its origins in the Second World War. It also helps pilots and radar operators save lives and not be overwhelmed by the technology in front of them. A subsequent brain MRI studies on multitasking. Richtel explains how researchers have discovered that distraction is the adversary of attention, not its opposite. That's a very interesting way to look at it. It basically says we get distracted because we want to be. Why else would they sell so many smartphones? As Richtel explains, "a good gadget is essentially magical, capturing our attention with joy, surprise and ease. Not all distractions are the same: the damage caused by drunk driving, for example, is consistently enormous, while the harm from sending text messages is likely to be greater." intense but short-lived. The most powerful question posed by the book “A Deadly Wandering” is very simple: if we know that texting and driving are so bad for us, why do we still do it? Richtel tests many different ways to describe the rush people usually feel when using a phone. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Other examples can be drugs, alcohol, video games, junk food, fight or flight response to a tap on the shoulder, etc. Richtel describes our bodies as a slot machine. Our bodies get that little hit of dopamine every time we hear the phone ring and feel that excitement and..