The Philippines has been ruled by so many presidents over the past decades. One of the best known is the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos. Ferdinand Emmanuel Edralin Marcos, commonly known as Ferdinand Marcos, was the tenth president of the Philippines. Born September 11, 1917 in Sarrat, Ilocos Norte. He received his education from the University of the Philippines following the law course. As the years passed, he was elected to the Philippine House of Representatives in 1949. He moved to the Senate in 1959 and became Senate President from 1963 to 1965. After failing to win his party's presidential nomination, he severed ties with the Party Liberal. and ran as a candidate of the Nationalist Party. Finally becoming President of the Philippines on December 30, 1965. Which to this day is still widely discussed among the Filipino people for how he had led the government and country of the Philippines. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Many people have different opinions about the reign of President Ferdinand Marcos. Some say it was the glory days of the Philippines and if its reign had continued we would now have been recognized as one of the best countries. On the other hand, he was also said to have abused his power to the limit. His period was known as one of two things, the time when the Philippines was at its peak, or the time when Filipinos were silenced. Many history teachers love to discuss the topic of his reign because of how many discussions it arises, as during that time he had actually been forced to resign from his position after 20 (coming to 21) years of presidency. He was re-elected in 1969 and was marked by increased violence and civil conflict from left-wing rebels. On September 21, 1972, after a series of attacks in Manila, he declared what we all know as martial law. Before martial law was declared a week earlier, some people had received news that Marcos had made a plan to completely take over the government and seize all power. Senator Benigno S. Aquino Jr., exposed on September 13, 1972 during an “Oplan Sagittarius” privilege speech. The senator said he had received a confidential plan offered by Marcos himself to place Metro Manila and outlying areas under the control of the Philippine Constabulary as a prelude to martial law. Using a series of bombings in Metro Manila, including the 1971 Plaza Miranda bombing, to justify his seizure of power. Marcos himself passed Proclamation Law 1081 in September 1972, which officially placed the Philippines under martial law, extending his mandate. During martial law, the streets were deemed clean, curfew times were strictly enforced, and fear was inflicted on the general public. During his time, the Philippines also became an exporter rather than an importer. We have imported various crops to other countries, boosting our economy. The Philippines also had nuclear power plants that were supposed to be used, but have now been left behind as vestiges of what President Marcos had planned. The Philippine peso was also almost equivalent to the US dollar due to the good performance of the economy and the country. You could say that, economically and nationally, Marcos had an enormous impact. Unfortunately, even the most beautiful things have their downsides. Not all Filipinos agreed with these terms. Some felt it was tightening their grip on freedom, especially after 300 years of colonization underthe Spaniards that the country had endured. Many objected to the President taking full control over everything, so politicians who seriously disagreed were jailed. One of those who opposed the issue was Benigno Aquino Jr. who was jailed for eight years. Not only politicians opposed it, but also some religious groups and church leaders. On August 21, 1983, Ninoy Aquino or better known as Benigno S.Aquino was assassinated at what is now known as Ninoy Aquino International Airport in his memory. This led to a riot because it was speculated or used as a reason that Ferdinand Marcos himself was the cause of Ninoy Aquino's assassination. In reality it had nothing to do with it at all. Despite this, this uprising sparked something within the nation. A rather unusual episode, without weapons, without deaths and without violence. This was marked and known in history as the first people power revolution. It occurred from February 22 to 25, 1986 and was led by various religious groups and people, including Jaime Cardinal Sin who actually opened the school gym. About 2 million people joined together and marched along Epifanio De Los Santos Avenue (EDSA), this marked a new era of democracy and freedom for Filipinos. With this event, Ferdinand Marcos resigned from the position of president after 20 years in office. Since then, Filipinos have celebrated the first People Power Revolution every February 25th. Now, what has happened since then? Well, after the impeachment, Ferdinand Marcos flew to another country until the issue died down. He died on September 28, 1989 in Honolulu, Hawaii, United States. This doesn't end here. Now that you have been given enough knowledge about the topic, what can you say about Ferdinand Marcos' term? This is still very questionable among ordinary people. The way law and order was applied to common people was like 2 sides of the same coin. In a country, law and order is a must, and in Ferdinand Marcos' expression it was fine, people were not discriminated against and were not deprived of their rights. However, those who may object may have encountered circumstances where law and order was not present, such as matters in court or justice was needed. According to some people, the streets were clean, a curfew was in place and basic laws were followed, which were rarely broken. This may lead to some speculation, was it due to the influence of the higher ups that caused the aforementioned riot? Or did a certain event or detail happen that the history books wouldn't want us to know for our own good? Was it just because people weren't getting their needs met with this style of government? It's all really strange. On this issue, in addition to martial law, the death penalty was also implemented. All serious criminals were put to death. This, at least in my opinion, may have been the main reason why people no longer wanted Marcos to be president. The possibility that the evidence presented was false, that the witnesses were telling lies, that the high probability of an injustice occurring that would lead to someone's death in exchange was excessive. It was as if to impose law and order a life had to be paid to instill fear in the hearts of many. Inside those hearts are the hearts of those who knew the injustice suffered by their loved ones. This brutality in enforcing the law must have labeled Marcos a dictator along with his other harsh implementations. What is disappointing is that although Filipinos of that time did indeed gain freedom, was that freedom enough to sacrifice all the great plans Ferdinand Marcos had for our country? The initial thought was perhaps that the.