In the United States, many states are still unsure whether to ban or allow euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. It is also called physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Medical aid in dying, or assisted suicide, is already legal in the states of Washington D.C., California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont and Washington state. The main reason for PAS is not pain; the dominant motivations are the loss of dignity, autonomy and the reduced ability to enjoy life's activities. I think humane euthanasia should remain legal/become legal in all US states. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay A person has the right to choose whether he wants to live or die. No one should be forced to live if they are unhappy and suffering. Neither the law nor medical ethics require that everything possible be done to keep a person alive. Insisting, against the patient's wishes, that death be postponed by any available means is contrary to law and practice. It would also be cruel and inhumane. There comes a time when continued attempts at treatment are not compassionate, wise, or medically sound. This is where hospice, including home care, can be of great help. This is the time when all efforts should be concentrated to make the patient's remaining time comfortable. Thus, all interventions should be directed at relieving pain and other symptoms, as well as providing emotional and spiritual support to both the patient and his or her loved ones. The idea of ​​euthanasia goes along the same lines. If a person is fully capable and aware of the choice they are making, it should be up to them to decide whether to follow through with it or not. Aid in dying is not an option for children, people with dementia, or anyone else who lacks the mental capacity to make medical decisions. Dying patients must be able to decide for themselves regarding their medical care and must reaffirm their desire for help in dying over a long waiting period. For example, in many US states, aid-in-dying laws require patients to express their wishes multiple times during a 15-day period. Aid-in-dying laws in these four states also require two doctors to determine that the patient can make medical decisions, is acting voluntarily and has made an informed choice about aid-in-dying. Additionally, if one of the doctors finds signs of a mental disorder, he or she should refer the patient for an evaluation by a mental health specialist. As a result, we have not seen aid-in-dying practiced on patients in the United States against their will, without their knowledge, or because their families made the choice for them. Often the discussion revolves around the right to life; Anti-euthanasia advocates argue that euthanasia violates a person's fundamental right to life. What they fail to see is that our “life” as human beings involves death. Without death, we do not have “human life” by its very definition. Like black and white or two sides of a coin, human life cannot exist without death. Therefore those who argue that every man has the fundamental right to life also unconsciously agree that every man has the fundamental right to die. Euthanasia does not cause any harm to others, it protects self-determination and dignity. Please note: this is just an example. Get a personalized document now come on.