IndexAbstractReport summaryIntroductionAbstractStereotypes, gender discrimination and oppression are still present in this society. To know the recent opinions or perspectives of people towards lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, a study was conducted. It has been assumed that there will be more negative reactions than positive attitudes. The result showed that most of the respondents accepted and supported LGBT people and are capable of becoming one of their allies. The findings of this essay on LGBT acceptance can be used to make people gain knowledge about social attitudes aimed at reducing any gender oppression or discrimination. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original EssayReport SummaryThe topic of contribution in the group of lesbian, gay, indiscriminate and transgender (LGBT) people is auspicious and significant. Some of the LGBT issues have entered the national discussion. At the same time, research and writing began to investigate the role of culture and personality in hierarchical administration and conduct. Specifically, writings on the procedures of authority and activism in LGBT associations and the broader group of LGBT people have expanded significantly compared to the previous decade. Despite the fact that the LGBT community has been seeking value in the open approach for a long time, it was only in the late 1990s and the mid-21st century that the network made great progress. Some of the current issues affecting the LGBT group include non-separation, residential arrangement benefits, and marriage rights. The Supreme Court overturning homosexuality laws in Lawrence v. Texas and Massachusetts Supreme Court which allowed same-sex marriage in Massachusetts for the situation, Goodridge v. Branch of Public Health, are examples of the progress made. However, the eleven-state section determined that changes characterizing marriage between a man and a woman are a case of considerable difficulty during the 2004 campaign. Now, in the development of gay rights, there is an extreme requirement that people from the LGBT group are included. Many political, legal and sociological writings have been written to examine current LGBT challenges, how best to achieve the goals, and what the suggestions would be for the LGBT group and society as a whole if the goals were achieved. IntroductionLGBT is a network that faces the constant problem of not being accepted by individuals with a conventional sexual direction. Before the end of the nineteenth century, the idea of ​​having a distinctive sexual personality did not exist, but people in the past led lives like our modern understanding of being LGBTQ. The gay character, both as an individual and as a political class, did not fully develop until the mid-20th century. Testable phrases used to represent sexuality and sex have often failed to accommodate the particularities that exist today. The British sexologist Havelock Ellis, for example, alluded to the two individuals we would today recognize as gay or transgender as "sexual inverts", who he characterized as people who show same-sex attraction and a sexual introduction socially opposite to the assigned sexual one during childbirth. German researcher and human rights extremist Karl Ulrichs also used the expression "Urning", which he described as the third sexual orientation existing among people, to allude topeople who today we might describe as gay, trans or genderqueer. Male Urnings, in Ulrichs' plan, were "male-bodied" individuals with the spirits of women, and female Urnings were "female-bodied" individuals with the spirits of men. The expression "gay", generated in 1869 by the Hungarian specialist Karoly Maria Benkert, who composed under the pseudonym. Kertbeny, was not in mainstream use until the mid-20th century. Mid-20th century gay activists preferred the term "homophile" to gay, seeing it as a progressively impartial and dignified alternative as it expunged the term "sexual" while certifying same-sex fascination. “Gay” became an underground term in the mid-20th century and rose to prominence in the 1960s. The term was favored by the Stonewall era, who, despite their antecedents, were less inclined to see being gay as a shame or psychological imperfection. Post-Stonewall activists sought to express a progressively extreme position, expelled from the framework of decency that homophile associations sought to develop. Although today "gay" commonly refers to men who are attracted to men, it was generally used as a broad term that included the entire cutting-edge LGBTQ acronym. For example, during the 1970s, activists Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson often discussed "gay rights" or "gay power" in reference to their freedom as shadow rulers (which today we would allude to as transgender ). The couple founded STAR (Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries) as an approach to organizing destitute trans youth. “STAR was for gay individuals on the move, vagrants and anyone who needed assistance at the time,” Rivera said. The expression "lesbian" originates from the Greek island of Lesbos, related to the writer Sappho, whose enduring compositions expressively portray sensual love and charm between women. Despite the use of the term "gay" as an umbrella term for sex and sexual minorities, the emergence of the women's movement in the mid-to-late 20th century (also known as the second wave of development of women's activism in United States) gave gay women the awareness to express how their encounters contrasted with both straight women, who included most of the Women's Movement, and gay men. The explanation of a particular lesbian personality was regularly required by the prohibitions that gay women sought in women's and gay activist associations. Betty Friedan, the main leader of the National Organization for Women (NOW), scandalously alluded to lesbians as "the lavender menace", claiming that their essence would ruin the association's goals by facilitating the suspicion that all female activists they were lesbians who hated men. . Likewise, lesbians have often experienced overt sexism in post-Stonewall gay associations, for example, the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) and the Gay Activists Alliance (GAA). However, until the 1990s, the term "gay" was often used as a shorthand term to allude to the full range of sexual and sexual minorities. This usage moved with the rise of cross-sexual, transgender, and queer developments, bringing to light the four-letter LGBT initialism, which was seen as more comprehensive than broadly alluding to the net as essentially "gay." These developments of the 1990s, while unambiguous in many respects, were linked to the common theme of addressing and studying personality parallels, e.g., gay/straight, man/woman, manly/gentlemanly, and standards of sex and sexuality in an even more complete way. . In the same way they expressed a feeling of characterwhich was baffling, liquid and evolving. The term "transgender" has been used and advanced by activists such as Kate Bornstein, Holly Boswell, Leslie Feinberg and Riki Wilchins, to create an alliance of people. who did not conveniently fit into sexual doubles, or who resisted the standards and desires of sexual orientation, especially after the 1993 attack and murder of trans man Brandon Teena in Humboldt, Nebraska. “Transgender” has also been used by people who did not relate to the term “transsexual,” due to its relationship to remedial progress with respect to sexual orientation. The letter "Q" was sometimes added to the acronym, on the other hand it alludes to 'eccentric', or to incorporate individuals who were "confronting" their sexual direction or their sexual character. The expression 'weird' may thus again allude to a recovered personality (which actually means 'strange' or 'curious', a word verifiably transformed into a censorious term for gays), a character who communicates an increasingly radical way , activist or fierce to address legislative issues of personhood, or a general term encompassing anyone or anything outside the standards of sex and sexuality. While it may be productive to refer to the LGBTQ group as “the weird,” “eccentric” network, for some, it is polarizing and remains hostile or critical. Given one's age, where one is becoming, or involvement with homophobia, "weird" can incite feelings of offense and prohibition. Since the 1990s, various forms of initialization have proliferated as progressively nuanced approaches to understanding and characterizing the experiences of individuals. the understanding of sex and sexuality is enunciated. An extended variant of the initialism used is LGBTQQIP2SAA, which represents: lesbian, gay, indiscriminate, transgender, queer, addressed, intersex, pansexual, two-souled, abiogenetic, and partner. Although this adaptation perfectly encompasses all the ways people achieve sex and sexual personality, it is not really effective. It's difficult to remember, let alone say, and will continually lead to giving those curious about the net a phrasing exercise. While comprehensive, extended adaptations of initialism are actually less successful at creating extended recognition and awareness because they are overly confusing and clunky? Perhaps, and this is the main question to consider. There is currently, and never has been, an agreement on how to address activism within the LGBTQ group, including government language issues. LGBTQ people are as diverse and changed as any other group. What unites us is the common encounter between sex and sexual minorities, yet the particularities of that experience vary from individual to individual. The crux of the matter is not to position some forms of initialism as "off-base" and others as "right." Rather, it is about stimulating basic inference about language as a vehicle for social change and perceiving that individuals do not need to concede everything to function publicly. Language in a perfect world unites us, not divides us. We should not reject others for using phrases we may not agree with or like, or for adopting an alternative strategy. We should, however, consider the words we use and whether they are truly fulfilling their intended need, or creating further problems. Speech problems are not senseless or random. The demonstration of naming or naming oneself can serve as surprising and approving knowledge. Language provides perceptibility and can shift social viewpoints on generally trashed encounters. Language does not simply describe our existence,.”