Rashomon is a Japanese film that talks about rape and murder in different versions in which it leads to the true meaning of the author, Akira Kurosawa, who wants to underline the nature of truth and reality . This film sets up the arguments as to what the resolution or truth actually is, but that's what makes it such an interesting topic to study when learning about perception and reality. The story contains the stories told by four witnesses; the woodcutter, the bandit, the wife and the samurai himself, telling their stories of what they believe happened from their point of view. The film offers us four points of view on the incident, one for each defendant, each revealing a few more details. Roger Ebert gave his perspective in which he believes each witness is telling the truth about how the murder situation occurred. Therefore, because people have different views and remember different things, Ebert states that there are multiple truths suggesting that truth is subjective. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Ebert's views related to expectancy theory which states that people expect to be what people might see, meaning that people might expect that what they say is all true, so truths are multiple. Expectancy is the influence on how people see things in which people may suffer not only from visual illusions, but also from illusions with each of the other senses. This may explain why there is no absolute truth and everyone has different beliefs, making that truth subjective to what one believes. In the movie Rashomon, each witness has a different background and different memory, which is why they talk about the murder in their expectations in their own way. In the bandit's story, he expects to be the one to kill the samurai because of his criminal past and what he said he would do. In the story of the wife who says she holds the knife, which she expects her to kill her husband since his dagger was in him. In the story of the woodcutter, he only sees after the murder what he expects to see what he wants to see. Therefore, people may misinterpret what they perceive due to the different experience they have created compared to the expectation. Another theory related to Ebert's view is eyewitness testimony in which he suggests that if people try to reconstruct and then try to explain but have already lost some information, just as "people cannot trust what they saw." This theory also depends on emotions and memories where sometimes people use the sense of the past or the memory that other people have told where each person observes and feels experiences differently, to reconstruct things. Emotions are also the influences on the truth and reality of a situation. It's what people use to make decisions, especially when it comes to quick decisions. The wife will be the good example of emotional effect where she uses her emotions and tears to say what was on her mind. In the story of the bandit, what he said is also due to the emotion of feeling a sort of disturbance, which leads him to see things in an exaggerated way, just as in the story of the woodcutter he could feel scared and afraid which also makes him say things exaggerate. From this theory it can be said that people could reconstruct something using memory, emotions and some lie in which they lose some information. Coherence also refers to Ebert's views on perception and truth because one usually seeks to?