Developments in the scientific environment have brought important changes to the normal process of healthcare delivery by focusing on a number of critical processes in the delivery of care. One of the scientific focuses of the recent past is euthanasia, which involves the intentional ending of an individual's life to avoid pain and suffering. Important arguments have been developed regarding the euthanasia process, creating a difficult environment to implement considering the significant focus within healthcare delivery on the fact that euthanasia is an ethical and illegal action (Julesz, 12). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The healthcare industry develops with strict adherence to professional ethics, which means that any action performed is aimed at promoting the greatest good for the patient. A key aspect of healthcare delivery involves ensuring that the patient is happy. Euthanasia has brought significant attention to the professional ethics underlying the healthcare environment. Euthanasia involves both voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia involves a patient who wishes to end his or her life due to the suffering and pain incurred, which cannot be eliminated by any available medication. Involuntary euthanasia involves a situation where a patient cannot give consent but it is very visible that the patient is in great pain and there is nothing that can be done to ward off the pain (Sandy MacLeod, 33-35). The ethical principle of utilitarianism highlights that an action is ethically correct if the outcome is believed to be most successful in bringing happiness. An ethically good action must be in the best interests of many. Considering these assumptions, euthanasia is ethically good if it is carried out in the best interests of many. Many people are involved in the whole euthanasia process directly or indirectly. The patient, family and doctor involved all have major concerns regarding the existing situation. Euthanasia is practiced only to avoid suffering and pain to the patient, but family members must also be able to provide critical understanding about what needs to be considered to limit their suffering. The continued presence of a patient in great pain and suffering has a negative influence on family members in terms of financial strain and emotional stress, which can be ended by euthanasia (Rachels, 16). Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom article now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay Bentham's felicific calculus provides a crucial understanding that the moral perspective of an action is measured by the total pleasure or pain that is produced based on the action. Therefore, a morally wrong action will automatically be based on total pain, while a morally right action will be judged based on the amount of pleasure derived from the action. Euthanasia in this case provides total pleasure, which includes the end of suffering and pain, as well as the elimination of family suffering. This is pleasure based on Bentham's happy calculation. Therefore, the action of euthanasia aims at total pleasure and not suffering, which makes it morally and ethically correct. The level of success helps everyone involved find peace. How an action is undertaken does not matter as long as the result is total pleasure (Mathai and Haubold, 56-61).