Dred Scott is someone I heard about growing up, but never really paid attention to his information. That the Dred Scott decision was referred to Dred v. Sandford by the Supreme Courts of the United States. I've always had it in my head that black people have never had anything to do with the courts. The Supreme Court was unkind in its ruling that if a person of African descent brought to the United States as a slave had no rights. That not even African descendants were protected by the Constitution. African origins could not worry even an American. The courts went even further with their power when they gave Congress no power to say or prohibit slavery. In my opinion, African descent seems to be the territory of slave owners and the white man, no matter what or who had anything to say. Since the African descendants were not Americans, they had no right to sue the courts. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayThe overarching question behind the Dred Scott decision was the fact that if you were to bring a slave to a free state, would that slave become free? The Supreme Court ruled that slavery cannot be prohibited and should be nationalized, arguing that property cannot be taken away from people, as they have a constitutional right to their property. At this time, the republican movement continued to grow from strength to strength. Residents of the Deep South were afraid that Republicans would destroy slavery, at least in Alabama. They began to wonder whether the South would be able to leave the Union if a Republican were elected. Harper's Ferry also helped fuel the fear. John Brown led an assault on the federal armory at Harper's Ferry, hoping to distribute weapons to slaves and start a slave rebellion. As fear increases, the South forms militias to defend itself from a possible rebellion. By the end of 1859, some Southerners began calling for a federal slave code, which had been proposed earlier in the Alabama Platform by Willian Lowndes Yancey. Yancey, along with other Southern radicals, began calling for the Democratic Party to adopt a commitment to federal legislation to protect slavery in the territories. Many Southerners, however, were critical of this additional slave code and considered it unnecessary. They knew that free-state Democrats could not support such a law and hoped to win in free states where anti-slavery sentiment was high. This causes a rift among Southern Democrats over how best to defeat a Republican candidate in the 1860 election. Dred Scot v. Stan Ford, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that African Americans, whether slaves or free, they could not be American citizens and, therefore, had no right to litigate in Federal Court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. Dred Scott, an enslaved African American who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In a 7-2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the Court denied Scott's request. The decision was only the second time in history that the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, in other words SCOTUS bowed to social norms and..