In the past, satire has been repeatedly used as a form of humor and irony to criticize and expose stereotypes, as well as political messages with comical geopolitical illustrations. Satirical cartography was often produced specifically to comment on the state of social, economic or political affairs (T. Harper 'Satirical map of the world'). For the centerpiece of the exhibition at the British Library, I believe “Hark!” Listen! The Dogs Do Bite' is the most suitable map. Walter Emanuel's use of satire and symbolism combined with the passage "The Dogs of War" creates a clear account of the events that occurred during World War I. I believe this map is the most interesting of the four not only for its unique and descriptive narrative told through illustrations and figurative language, but also for its vibrancy and use of internationally recognized stereotypes and symbols. This allows anyone to immediately recognize what the map tells, as well as important factors and key figures who played a significant role in the years before the start and end of the war. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay One such figure is John Bull. John Bull is the national personification of the United Kingdom. Although he was not a real person, he represented the will of the British people in the early 1900s. John Arbuthnot introduced John Bull in "The History of John Bull" as "an honest and forthright fellow, choleric, daring and of very erratic character." It was often used as propaganda in 1914, urging many young men to enlist and enlist. join the war forces. In this map he represents British naval power and his large size compared to other anthropomorphic figures highlights Britain's power and influence on the geopolitical world in the early 20th century. literary work” (T. Conley, 2007) This is evidently reflected in the map I chose: 'Listen! Listen! The dogs are barking!' as it uses zoomorphism to represent alliances and rivalries during the First World War. Zoomorphism, like anthropomorphism, is an effective way used by several cartographers to symbolize certain countries and regions by using animals to represent them. This is shown in this map when Germany, a central power during World War I, is shown as a dachshund, a recognized symbol of Germany that was predominantly used in the early 20th century by political cartoonists to mock and ridicule them. In contrast, Britain is shown as a bull dog who had the habit of "sleeping with one eye open, and when he is awakened, he grasps and does not let go." Map 1 was evidently against the axis powers of World War I and this is highlighted by the positive connotations of the brave, strong and stubborn bulldog and the relatively negative portrayal of the dachshund who "despised" the bulldog who adamantly bit his nose and did not he wanted to let him go. One of the main reasons for a conflict that would be exclusively between Serbia and Austria-Hungary, the conflict turned into a world war due to the numerous alliances. This is demonstrated in the text below the map, “The Dogs of War”, as it highlights how the role of friendship between the dogs increased tensions.” Little Servian had a great friend in the form of a Russian bear” and “the Russian bear had friends too.” Ultimately, the “Russian bear,” the “French poodle,” and the “British bull dog” emerged as the winners in 1918. In addition to being aesthetically pleasing, this map allows anyone looking for newknowledge of knowing the events of the war, thus making it a good centerpiece suitable for all audiences.'Listen! Listen! The dogs are barking!' it is an important piece of history. It is a source of primary data that shows ideals and perspectives in 1914 and allows us and any historian to gain deeper insight into what people believed a hundred years ago. From this map it can be concluded that it was written as anti-German propaganda. In the end: "The dachshund's heart bleeds for Belgium and his nose for Great Britain." In addition to having a pro-British viewpoint, it also demonstrates a Eurocentric perspective in which Europe appears to be given greater importance and superiority over other regions and continents. Although non-European countries such as America also participated in the war, only the main European countries were shown. It can be argued that this could be due to the fact that most of the fighting occurred in Europe and because the United States of America only joined in 1917, however, this Eurocentric design indicates European power and influence all beginning of the 20th century. Today, the world's most important superpowers include America, Russia and China (among others), but until a century ago Great Britain with its vast empire would have occupied first place, followed by Germany. By depicting the Dachshund's defeat, Britain along with the other European powers would be glorified and perceived as the saviors. This is further emphasized as the map does not show the correct size of Europe and omits several countries. This suggests that only the countries shown distinctly in the map are significant to what it is trying to convey, which in this case is the fighting between the Central European powers during the First World War. Emanuel also used a color scheme to represent the positions each country had in 1914. Some countries such as Spain, Italy and Belgium are yellow. This is to show how neutral they were. Although Italy was primarily part of the Triple Alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary, it switched sides in 1915 and although Belgium maintained anti-German attitudes throughout the war, it remained neutral. The color yellow can symbolize happiness, positivity and energy, but it can also represent cowardice. The color yellow may have been used to criticize the role these neutral countries took in the war. Patriotism and nationalism played a vital role in recruiting soldiers and boosting morale. Thus, the lack of desire to unite and fight on behalf of their countries may have made nations like Spain appear weak when the war broke out. Interestingly, Russia, a major ally during the war, is also in yellow. This is to show the delicate diplomacy between the two countries in the 20th century. In 1904 Great Britain and France signed the Entente Cordiale. This established a formal alliance between the two countries; despite the mutual defense agreement between France and Russia, created to prevent an attack by the United Kingdom. To ease tensions, Russia was admitted to the Triple Entente. Since Russia had promised to help Serbia, Britain and France were also obliged to do so and eventually this led to the outbreak of a massive war in Europe. Despite this mutualistic agreement, tensions between the two powers continually increased after the war as the Soviet Union attracted attention and the Cold War began to take shape. These geopolitical tensions remain today. In contrast to the vibrant yellow, Britain and France are red. It represents passion, danger and refers to the color of good luck in several Asian countries. The red color easily captures ours.