If we approach the ethicality of an act from the point of view presented by Jhon Stuart Mill, we tend towards utilitarianism and believe that this is ethical, but in reality, ultimately , we are reducing opinions to nothing. According to Haidt's idea, even if society has instilled in us the idea that everything becomes ethical if there is a greater good, we still have an intuition that helps us distinguish right from wrong. This intuition is intuition and if we use it to judge how ethical an act is, we would ultimately do what is in favor of everyone and not just the majority. One idea states that the means of an act can be justified by the ends and if this is the approach we take then ultimately every act can be considered ethical, however the basis on which good and evil are judged is how whether it is beneficial or not. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay This is where this approach comes in and by accepting it, we challenge what tends to be human. An individual will never be able to justify their actions if even one person is harmed; if not a person, then the life of an animal or plant. By ignoring fundamental questions like how many people will be harmed, we try to escape the unethical aspects of our actions. If it is argued that by taking care of the needs of the majority, even if through unethical means, we can create a sense of happiness in them. and that staff satisfaction is above all, this approach is somewhat justified but again not acceptable. However, when compared with the completely opposite approach (Deontology), considering ethical acts if they are beneficial to most people seems like a better approach. Just because most people do it doesn't mean it becomes ethical. But, for example, if you hold yourself the center of attention and consider the simple question: If it happened to you, would you consider it good or bad? When such a dilemma arises, ethical approaches fail to serve a purpose. This is why each approach is accurate to some extent for each individual. Each of us has a brain that helps us distinguish between good and bad and that too depending on the situation. Therefore an act can become ethical and unethical depending on the situation. So the question is always, “How ethical…?” and not “Why is this ethical…?” It can never be answered from just one side and will always remain open to debate. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, the degree of how right this approach is or how wrong it is varies from person to person and I believe that it is completely unethical to justify actions just because a certain number of people benefit from it even if it is the majority . But compared to other ideas, it may be ethical.