Macbeth or Lyndon B. Johnson The king was a beloved leader who was unreasonably killed by a person he believed to be loyal to them. The accused of the murder is innocent and those who were responsible for his safety did not keep their promise. The leader's successor will take his place soon after and the citizens will not suspect the culprit. The successor felt he had gotten what was rightfully his. You might think it sounds like the plot of a fantasy story, but that's because it comes from Shakespeare's Macbeth. What may actually surprise you is that the 17th century tragedy was mimicked by one of the most controversial events in US history, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States. President Kennedy's North American tour in Dallas on November 22, 1963 was cut short when a sniper, Lee Harvey Oswald, shot him from the sixth floor of the infamous Book Depository building. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The FBI thought this was a one-man plot targeting Oswald. Many theories have surrounded this assassination. The most famous of the theories has always been the one that linked Lyndon B. Johnson to the tragic event. The plot would be full of deceit and torment, just like the story of Macbeth. Although the characters in the stories have different names, the motive and outcome are eerily similar. Once considered a conspiracy theory in history, current events are finding that JFK's tragedy at the hands of Lyndon B. Johnson may no longer be a theory. These circumstances suggest that the events that occurred in Shakespeare's tragedy Macbeth are still possible. It is possible that the plot of the famous tragedy will be repeated in modern America of the 20th century. That said, no protection provides absolute and total security, many men are still willing to commit the crimes that Macbeth got what they wanted, and the act could still be covered by a simple and believable alibi and scapegoat. In today's world it is easier than ever to plan and execute a murder. Anyone can buy a cheap gun, pull the trigger, and kill someone. It's also much easier to kill a person without getting caught. There are long-range rifles and remote-controlled explosives that can be used as a murder weapon while the one behind is away from the scene. Furthermore, it is easier than ever to find a professional assassin willing to kill anyone for a very large sum of money. The latter methods could allow a person to commit murder and get away with it. Even if the real killer were caught, the person financing the enterprise could very well get away with it. In Macbeth, Duncan was extremely well protected by his guards. However, he was still brutally murdered. The guards were overwhelmed by a very simple trick. “The doors are open and the sated grooms mock their escort by snoring. I have drugged their goods…” says Lady Macbeth. She had seduced the men and drugged their drinks, instead of watching over Duncan, they slept. Macbeth easily managed to overcome them undetected and kill Duncan. Every conceivable precaution had been taken to ensure the protection of the beloved King Duncan. It's no easy feat to get past two armed bodyguards in an exceptionally confined area. However, through a double cross, Macbeth managed to achieve this goal. This awakens the assertion that no protection is absolute. One can imagine that the best example of the fact that no protection is foolproof manifests itself in the previous situation involving former President Kennedy. Kennedy was in a vehicle.