Since the dawn of school, educators have tried to find an effective way to increase success in school and maintain student satisfaction. There have been many strategies explored by the education system to increase the overall morale and educational level of students. It was only around the 16th century that school uniforms began to appear in schools. These uniforms were manifested to guide students to achieve success by emphasizing a safe environment and influenced by GRIT (courage, resilience, integrity, tenacity) although this does not convey similar emotions to all students. There are many disadvantages to the school uniform, one of which is that they violate the first amendment and take away free speech, and the rest comes down to accessibility for all of society. Despite opposition from critics, school uniforms are constructive for students for academic purposes, so the government should be allowed to allow school districts to mandate uniforms among students. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay The government should be allowed to hold the power to emphasize school uniforms at all public levels of education until high school is passed. Congress passed it in favor of students. The mentality of the congress is in favor of student safety. Laws and previous court cases against school uniforms have been in favor of school systems mandating school uniforms. These lawsuits clearly reveal the ambition the government has for the education system. “For example, in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School (1969), the court held that a student's freedom of expression at school must be protected unless it is. .. interfere with disciplinary obligations. In a school context, this can and should be extended to displaying individuality through clothing.” (The perspective). Laws enacted by states also have very specific reasons for their actions: “To control the environment in public schools to facilitate and maintain an effective learning environment and to keep the classroom's focus on learning and not on personal safety, schools need permission to implement uniform dress requirements for our public school children.' (TITLE 2. ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION [33000 - 64100], Title 2 issued by Stats. 1976, Ch. 1010.). They also imply that once you enter school, the First Amendment does not apply to you because the school wants to achieve its goal. According to Lyle Denniston, a professor, "the Supreme Court has said repeatedly that those students do not lose their First Amendment rights when they enter school; it has said that authorities can sometimes impose some forms of compliance to help run the schools." teaching and civic education missions” (Constitution Test: Do School Uniform Policies Violate the First Amendment?). Supreme Court wants to act as a regulator, choosing what is best for the public school system. School uniforms manifest a path that can divert the child's creativity from clothing to help him build education by focusing attention on school work essential way to increase educational attainment; By removing this, you are “limiting distractions. Human ways of expressing themselves. The childrenthey need ways to process how they show affection and creativity. It is said that some people block their creativity due to external problems. According to FrenchToast.com “It is human nature to express our personality and creative talent. However, many students use clothing as their only creative outlet. These children are misguided. Today's youth need to learn that, if channeled correctly, they become individuals whose creativity can blossom within” (FrenchToast.com). Additionally, uniforms eliminate uniqueness, and uniqueness can help a student identify who they truly are. Elise Elliot, a mom who has seen firsthand the changes in school attire due to her children's extreme attendance at school: “First of all, as the name suggests, they create uniformity. And a sense of equality. Here there are no gulfs between the “haves” and the “have-nots”. Mandatory uniforms eradicate peer pressure to wear expensive, cutting-edge clothes” (Thank God for School Uniforms). Uniforms place emphasis on certain traits. It strengthens students' grit that will lead to long-term success. “Schools defend mandatory uniforms on the grounds that they improve behavior, build spirit, develop the student's sense of belonging, and define the school's identity in the community” (Thank God for School Uniforms). School uniforms can make it difficult for students to divert their creativity through clothing, however with these limited distractions created by school uniforms children are able to focus their minds on bringing out their inner creativity and cerebral thinking. The National Police Department sees a dramatic decrease in violence once school uniforms are instilled among students. This tidal change from high violence to low violence is controlled by school districts adapting to school uniforms, keeping them intact and following policy. Uniforms have a direct relationship with violence. Police records provide the data to proportion these statistics. How this was an immediate effect and if the uniforms were taken away, the results would immediately be reversed. Atlantic reporter Nadra Nittle reported that “Time magazine reported in 1995 that the number of gun-related crimes in LBUSD decreased by 52 percent. Drug use decreased by 69% and fighting by 51%” (20 years have passed since Long Beach Unfied's historic school uniform policy). Another reporter named Melissa Kelly was able to back up this claim with multiple logos: “Long Beach…officials found that…overall school violence was down 36%.…A study of 2012 found that..."Nevada police data found a 63% decrease in police reports" (Pros and Cons of School Uniform). All these statistical facts demonstrate a trend of an inverse relationship between uniforms and crime rates. Obtained through uniforms, uniforms provide a blanket of protection against clothing or gang affiliations. Areas with surrounding gangs have the ability to reduce gang representation or affiliations in this way. Representation of gangs decreases, lowering the rate of crime attributed to gangs. “According to the Los Angeles Times, school uniforms have reduced gang activity in Los Angeles schools because students are not allowed to wear gang colors to school, thus decreasing the presence of gang affiliations” (Gabrielle AppleburyM.A ., Statistics on School Uniforms).“(5) The adoption of a relative policyto school-wide uniforms is a reasonable way to provide some protection to students. A required uniform can protect students from being associated with a particular gang. “(Article 4.7 title added by Stats. 1998, Ch. 744, Sec. 5.). Gang attire can make other students uncomfortable. It can make students feel uneasy about their safety. “Gang-related clothing” is dangerous to the health and safety of the school environment….Adopting a school uniform policy is a reasonable way to provide some protection to students” (Title 2 issued by Stats. 1976, Chap. 1010. ). Gang clothing is eventually eliminated from school uniforms. Not all students are confident, or targets of bullying, and in the essence of school uniforms, students feel more confident in their physical attire, or free from worries about bullies because they "fit in." “Physical clothing can lead to shame or a lack of confidence.” In America, where most schools do not have a uniform, around 160,000 children miss school every day for fear of attacks or intimidation by other students " (TheGuardian.com) . The ethics of a student, the bully can also cause depression due to bullying based on the judgment of the physical attire of others. “Amelia says: 'I think uniforms... help prevent bullying. You are less likely to be teased about the cost or style of your clothes' (Gabrielle AppleburyM.A., Statistics on School Uniforms). This pie chart from the Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics shows an approximately 20% decrease in both student safety and bullying when school uniforms are in place. By having every student dressed in the same clothing, students are prevented from lashing out in anger. compared to other students based on what they wear and also helps recognize children as students so you can spot them in public. Prevent disasters from occurring. Possible clues from school disasters occurring due to silly things. “After the events at Columbine High School in 1999, in which students were singled out in part for what they wore, and after numerous thefts and murders involving designer shoes, it is obvious why many school districts want to institute uniforms.” (Melissa Kelly, Pros and Cons of School Uniform). Helps keep the school directly related to maintaining student safety. Schools can identify threats. "To control the environment in public schools to facilitate and maintain an effective learning environment and to keep the classroom's focus on learning and not personal safety, schools need permission to implement uniform dress requirements for our public school children" (TITLE 2. ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION [33000 - 64100], Title 2 issued by Stats. 1976, Ch. 1010.) This also prevents outsiders from intruding into schools students in uniform are minors and therefore should not be flirted with, served alcohol or engaged in any adult behavior. Additionally, when students are required to wear uniforms, it becomes much easier to identify intruders on campus, who stick out like sore thumbs, increasing. thus the safety of students while studying” (The Perspective). By making everyone look like stooges, intruders are easy to spot. While some Americans do not have to worry about the cost of school uniform, this is not the circumstance for everyone. Many Americans, like lower class people and immigrants.