Gun control was a controversial issue before being incorporated into US presidential debates numerous times during the election. A portion of the population is distressed that banning gun ownership or seriously restricting residents' right to use firearms will constitute an invasion of their rights. Due to the current increase in mass shootings and riots against police officers, a reprieve has been granted regarding limits on gun ownership and use. This paper argues that arms management is critical both in the short term and in the future. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayFirst, the most prominent range of manslaughter is usually related to the legal division; where crimes committed with weapons represent the most effective range of arrests. Dominant guns, for example, limit the number of recent gun owners along these lines, limiting the likelihood of further wrongdoing. The management of small arms can, all things considered, save lives. One of the main reasons why gun management is important is the increase in shootings, especially on college campuses. A couple of innocent students have already passed on to the afterlife thanks to the large number of firearms in our hands. This has pushed shooters to use weapons improperly. Furthermore, some of the opponents of small arms management say that watching could be a key action in their lives, for which they expect weapons to hunt. In any case, some of the weapons used for the search are assault and semi-automatic. Indeed, assault weapons, which represent a crucial stage of gun control by non-public residents, should not be used for research purposes. So be the same once someone asks him to use the associated AR-15 to be used in sports, it wouldn't be. The use of assault weapons for research purposes constitutes abuse. Programmed and rapid-fire weapons are the most effective demand for mass shooters, since such weapons in the wrong hands are very risky. These types of weapons should be in the hands of legal authorities because they were. Guns will work great for appearance functions as they are simple to keep around and small enough to cover. With the further implementation of small arms management, voters would want proof of the rationale for why they are purchasing such weapons and would like a legitimate license to carry weapons. Even if this is not the case, they will not get the same weapon, avoiding many casualties if the wrong person had access to a weapon. People and groups restricting the handling of guns beyond the purpose of the second amendment which allows all of us to own guns with the primary goal of individual and group social insurance. In any case, such rights appeared valid and intelligent in a few minutes when non-public citizens did not speak in confidence to the national government. The American Civil War of the mid-nineteenth century gave us this reason. However, nowadays, wherever private citizens have decided to sign many weapons without any danger to their lives, it is necessary to look for when the second changes with an associated warning. Fatal shootings of police officers have been on the rise over the past five years. Therefore, the pursuit of the second change should be cautious, and small arms management should be supported. One of the aspects that make the management of small arms difficult is that the ability of the usual voters equipped to maintain.