The man in the story 'Hills Like White Elephants' uttered the requiem statement 'This is the only thing that disturbs us. It's the only thing that made us unhappy.' The instigator of this narrative, Ernest Hemingway, is commonly considered unadorned because his writing nature obviously seems so easy and lucid. Hemingway's simplicity of writing is what makes him subject to discernment. The characters in this tale interact regularly in a pure way, the central element of the story is told in a simple but intricate way. Which makes Hemingway's style much more extraordinary and unusual. The woman in the story is subjected to contradictory oppression that many readers have failed to perceive. Ernest Hemingway's 'Hills Like White Elephants' illustrates a passive and submissive concept of protecting affectionate affection due to the man's contrasting decision, the woman's tolerant idealism, and the truth that each character and reader has stopped absorbing. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay While the couple waits for the expresso, the man often counters their conversation with a contradictory response. The man appears to display a dominant position. His total of things emerged constructively from the way he stated the decision while at the same time simulating appearing as an empathetic meaning. But the case is elsewhere, the reality that lies in the characterization of the man is much more extensive than what readers have described of him. While the woman continues to admire the hills and wonder about many things: from the beaded curtain, to the sun railings and the empty desolation on the special side of the expressly designated expanse. With this action, the woman can be seen as indecisive about the truth of her journey, covering it with countless unenlightened questions to push further under the step of frankness she is about to take. The story progressed in a short manner. Furthermore, with a leading conversation that appears rather a "casual conversation" with a paradoxical hidden representation. The woman in the story brings with her many characteristic traits that best represent some women in modern society. His peripheral perspective in ways of conversing allows the reader to reflect on what peripheral metaphor he is trying to execute. Discerning the man's personality is vague, he constantly dodged some topics in hopes of ending the tense moment. However, there are some parts that allow readers to take a turn with his personality. But, despite his other dialogues, it all came to a refutable result. While the story may appear simple on the surface as it hurtles towards the end, there are still gaps that allow readers to take into account what these certain statements show, a space of wonder that allows the reader to develop a panorama of ideas and theories . .The woman in this story, "The Hills Like the White Elephant", "Jig", as the man in the story called her, is about to take a one-way ticket to inevitable death... But, not without the continuous affliction of man. Likewise, her unyielding nature is what makes this story an illustration of a woman's submission to her partner; no longer only in commitment, but also in his personal choice regarding the maintenance of what man regularly guaranteed as a way to be happy. His questions are complemented by those of a youth. The idea of ​​wanting to gratify man and his coy, coy objective. Jig, as the man called the woman in the short literary piece, manifests an infinityhesitation regarding what the man asked of her, but nevertheless her submission is still evident with the promise of a good conclusion. The leap forward and the symbolism of each character differ from each other. The woman seemed rather stressed or perhaps disconcerted emotions; The projection of intention suggests its rawest intent. The woman said this word “But if I do it, then it will be beautiful again if I say that things are like white elephants, and will you like it?” in which the idea is elaborated that the woman's inability to procure things on her own, blinded by submission towards her accomplice, has affected her freedom as a woman. The woman is a replica of typical sexism under the guise of commitment and what should be “right” in the setting of the story. On the other hand, the man showed captivating emotions, however behind the facade, if you examine carefully, his game is perceptible. Man has clearly imposed attributes of self-centeredness since the creation of history. Along with the privilege of being born a man, his reformative and ruminative thoughts led to the idea of ​​cloying the woman to whom he had sworn numerous promises in exchange for being summoned to his impartial actions. The story has its pros and cons in terms of symbolism; The hills that appeared in the distance like a white elephant are the woman's reference to the action she is about to carry out of what until the end of the story she believed to be "love", but it was nothing similar to that word to indicate the sublimation of things. clear as blue water: deception played a role, prejudicial judgment had its effect, desire influenced the dilemma and finally apathy gave up its diagnosis. Has love ever been present in history? In the middle of the story, while the woman, “Jig” as mentioned; is about to argue with their spar seems to end when the woman uttered this melancholy question as a statement that must have left readers thinking for a moment: "That's all we do, isn't it: look at things and try new drinks?” ' Has love ever been present in history? The statement gave the impression of a fabricated relationship. Somehow it seemed like the couple were out there exploring things while it was still new, the same thing occurred when author Ernest Hemingway narrated the following explanation in which he stated that the man no longer said anything, instead he watched the luggage towards the station wall. It is said that on them there were labels from all the accommodations in which they had spent the nights. This particular part of the story is a twist on things, it supports the idea that what they are engaging in was never "love", but rather a superficial involvement that made them believe that they would be able to achieve the joy of their journey. . Like a drink destined to end or rather a train destined to reach its destination. Both characters find themselves in a disconcerting story. The story itself was never established as a happy ending. Furthermore, their relationship seemed short-sighted. They are too caught up in the moment of their respective intent and torment. Ernest Hemingway's 'Hills Like White Elephants' is structured to convey not just a surface level story but rather a metaphorical figuration that will allow the reader to reflect on many things. The ending of the short prose is completed by the woman conforming to the man's desires. As the story came to a conclusion, the words "There's nothing wrong with me" were uttered. I feel good.' it's the final blow. The woman is the epitome of someone who is confused despite the man's true nuance being shown throughout the story. Man is the symbol of the selfishness that perhaps would bring the.