To begin with, there are many social and economic issues occurring in our world today. For example, one issue might be gun control laws. Since nearly 1/4 of our nation's population owns a gun, it begs the question of whether or not gun control laws should be increased. This argument has multiple pros and cons. Two of the main arguments against increasing gun control laws are one; laws created for gun control do not deter crime, and two; Laws created to control guns violate human rights to protect themselves. To be more precise, in the 29 years that certain weapons were prohibited, the number of murders did not decrease. Instead it remained more or less the same. On the other hand, states that had stricter gun control laws had higher murder numbers. These murders were all firearms related. Subsequently, many people use guns to protect themselves. In fact, self-defense with firearms has been used more than a million times per year. Since authorities cannot guarantee safety for everyone 24/7, people have confirmed that the more restrictions, the less safety they can provide for themselves and others. On the other hand, two of the main arguments in favor of increased gun control laws are one; increasing laws created for gun control would prevent gun deaths, and two; it would also ensure the safety of women in specific situations (domestic violators). To go into detail, many people use a firearm when it comes to harming themselves or others. In fact, over 14 years, over 400 thousand people have died from firearms. Strict laws would prevent this from happening. Additionally, stricter gun laws can prevent women from being killed by a rapist. Considering the presence of firearms during violent domestic arguments, the percentage of female victims rises up to 500%. With stricter laws, women can be assured of their safety during violent disputes. Overall, the increase in gun control laws has many positives and negatives. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Then, another problem that is occurring in society is the death penalty. In the span of 19 years, over 1,000 human beings were executed for their crimes. As people are sentenced to death, this raises the question of whether the death penalty should be allowed or not. This argument has multiple pros and cons. Two of the main arguments against authorizing the death penalty are one; the action is likely to disobey the prohibition on torture, and two; it is argued that the death penalty has no effect. To be more specific, Saddam Hussein said that execution methods can cause so much suffering that they can easily disobey the country's human rights law and ban on torture. By allowing the death penalty, the State goes against the laws and acts it should follow. Furthermore, the death penalty is said to reduce specific crimes, among others, but this is not true. Studies have shown that the results of the death penalty do not stop or reduce the number of murders. The number of victims is still more or less the same. On the other hand, two main arguments in favor of authorizing the death penalty are one; allows victims to get the justice and fairness they desire, and two; the death penalty will prevent those who.