Firstly, there are many reasons why journalists have lost trust over the years and I believe a large part of this is down to social media and from 24/7 news. 24/7 news has a high demand for content, which means journalists have to gather information, facts and figures quickly, which means who don't always manage to do it well. However there is always demand for the latest stories, the public wants to know exactly what is happening as soon as it happens, which has caused a lack of trust within the journalistic circle. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Within this I think the pursuit of profit has had a huge impact on why journalists have also lost faith. This may be because the main mission will be considered the most important and therefore the quality of journalism is lacking. The more money that is offered for a story, the more likely it is that some will be willing to "break the rules" as such and try to obtain information perhaps in an unethical way, which, in my opinion, is destroying trust among the public and journalists. That said, there are many ways the media can address this issue and regain trust in journalism. For starters, the media can address the lack of trust in journalism by being completely “transparent” about mistakes made by journalists. An example of this was when the Times published an apology for writing about public health experts' "financial ties" to the tobacco industry in 2016. The apology ended with "we apologize for our errors and omissions and for the embarrassment caused." this The Times showed that they accepted that they were wrong, making the public believe that if they did something wrong again, they would open it up and tell it, without transparency the public could believe everything that is written and in the future, find out which is not true. Maintaining trust between the public and journalists is important, not only to keep a news outlet running, but also to get interviews and facts from members of the public. No trust means no real content. Another way the media can address the lack of trust is to obtain real evidence and reliable sources. When journalists have evidence and good, reliable sources, the media and the public are more likely to trust the content that is released. If, however, they use unreliable sources and the quality of the journalism is lacking, those who read may begin to lose even more trust. .However, obtaining reliable sources can prove difficult for 24/7 news because content is constantly changing. Watchdog news is also an important aspect in which the news media can help regain trust in journalism, this is because watchdog news takes much more time and energy to tell the story and usually includes many facts and figures explaining in detail what's happening. about what they are publishing. By creating in-depth and trustworthy content, your audience will have no choice but to believe what is published. Without such content there is no proof that what is published is 100% real. This also applies to investigative journalism. Investigative journalism is a fundamental part of journalism and is important to maintain trust between the public and the journalist, this is because it is all "real" journalism and usually about events that affect many people, the more investigative journalism the morereal, hard. news out there.The Edelman (Trust Barometer [online]. Ebook. Edelman) study on trust shows that 53% of people trust journalists and only 35% trust platforms, such as social media. In this study, the question: "How often do you consume news produced by major newspapers, both from original and shared sources?" 50% say they disengage and consume news less than once a week. I believe that social media has had a huge effect on the trust of journalists, however I also think that if used correctly, it can help regain the trust of younger members of the public, which in turn will increase trust around the world. Fake news and social media initially caused a huge lack of trust in journalism, this is because many people cannot distinguish between real and fake news. Many also assume that anything on social media is written by a journalist, when in fact much information online can come from any member of the public. Click bait also makes it difficult to see real news as a lot of fake news is clicked. If the media addresses the problem of social media, then they can use it to their advantage, for example, advertising on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook gets the real news. news outlets will have the opportunity to be "heard" and spread fake news. On fake news, Edelman's study suggests that 63% of people cannot distinguish what is fake and what is real news. The media can teach the public to decipher what comes from real journalists and what comes from the general public. This makes people less likely to believe everything they read online or on social media. Another way the media can address the lack of trust in journalists and help them regain public trust is to ensure all media outlets follow the Ofcom or Ipso codes. (except those who follow their own practices and codes, e.g. the BBC) and within this, review all codes and practices within Ipso/Ofcom. This would help regain lost trust as the public would know that all journalists are subject to the same rules and cannot act just to get a story. These codes are important as the demand to be the first news outlet to publish a story is high, which in turn affects the quality of journalism and ethics that some follow. Rules for source protection should also be re-evaluated, many people do not want to provide information on a particular story, for fear of their name being leaked, stronger and more “set in stone” rules for source protection would increase the trust that the public gives to journalists. This makes people more likely to provide information, which in some cases serves to help police cases, only if journalists can become more trustworthy with their sources. Trust in journalists also has a big impact on politics and the public's attitude to stay engaged with what is happening in their country. Therefore, it is important that journalists work to regain trust in all media, otherwise those who decide to disengage may choose not to vote/not inform themselves about politics, which not only affects journalists but affects the way the world works . politics, the left, the right and political debate are aspects in which trust between the journalist and the public can decrease, depending on which party they align themselves with. In this, for example, The Guardian is Labour, which leans towards the centre-left. That said, it means that those on the right don'tthey will trust or not believe anything written. Solving this problem would mean remaining neutral within politics, providing facts but not being partial. This can be difficult for news outlets depending on their ownership and who they are funding. Is local journalism in crisis? In short, yes, local journalism is in crisis, especially in recent decades. Local journalism is journalism that covers events in a local area that would not affect the rest of the world, for example covering the opening of a new store in a small town or a festival taking place in that particular area. Some examples of local journalism are Bournemouth Echo and Devon Live. Both of these outlets publish and cover events which more or less only affect those areas, for example Bournemouth Echo publishes "Large queues form at Bournemouth's Build-A-Bear for unique offer" on 12 July 2018. An article like this , clearly doesn't strike many outside Bournemouth. Because these stories don't touch many people, local journalism is in crisis. Local journalism is needed to inform 'locals' about what's happening, for example Devon Live publishes daily information on road closures, weather warnings and more. So all in all, local news is still very important, especially since somewhere newspapers are the only way to get your news. Local journalism often has many more "human interest" stories that are more relatable to individuals within a particular area, there are many benefits and challenges to local journalism that put some local media at risk. One of the main advantages of local journalism is that they capture a more localized point of view, which is one of the main reasons why local journalism is still vital. This is because those in the local area are more likely to read these news stories because the events covered affect them personally. Local newspapers and other news outlets most likely weed out all international stories and are therefore more likely to read them because they don't have to rummage through stories they aren't as concerned about. However; That said, there are many more challenges facing local journalism that make it increasingly difficult for them to stay afloat. One of the reasons fewer and fewer people read local news is because it's not about the “juicy” stuff, there are no big crimes, big events or political debates – it's all small town stories that many aren't interested in. Some crimes are featured in local newspapers, but only if they occurred in the local area in which that newspaper writes, otherwise it is daily news about upcoming events, jobs, store openings/closings and human interest stories. One challenge that is having a big effect on localized journalism is funding. News outlets like the BBC, Sky and The Times receive much more funding because they have a larger circulation and therefore receive much more funding, from charities, lotteries and public funding. (Including the people who watch, read, and buy what the media is creating.) However; for local newspapers, it's much harder to get the funding they need to continue publishing because they don't get the circulation or readership they need. While funding is still an issue for many local journalists, since 2017 the BBC has agreed to spend £8 million a year to fund 150 local journalists keeping outlets afloat. Local news media caters to those within that area, meaning anyone outside of that location will not help fund that journalism. Since local newspapers are aimed at those who are in a.