At the beginning of history, man believed that his decisions, choices and actions were dominated by immutable destiny and fate. The ancient Greeks believed that the gods were the ones who guided every step of their lives. Destiny could not be avoided and had to be followed. Today, in the 21st century, this notion of destiny has completely disappeared. When we arrive in this world, the first life principle we learn is that free will surrounds our being; we are autonomous human beings and therefore we are responsible for our actions, whether they are right or wrong; if wrong, we are forced to accept the consequences that arise from our own decisions. A human being is regarded as a legal model that “accepts the philosophical postulate that individuals have free will and are capable of making rational and selfish choices… [It] accords individuals the status of autonomous moral agents who, because they have freedom axiomatic of choice, they can rightly be held responsible and punishable for the rational choices… they make”. The notion of free will is inevitably connected with autonomy; and autonomy is an important value linked to responsibility. However, one of the most important questions that has been debated for years is whether we are actually free to make our own choices and accept responsibility for them or whether this is just a myth. In other words, if someone else indirectly has control over our lives and has the power to brainwash people into believing that they are actually autonomous. “Free will” is often described as the ability of a rational person to choose to act in a certain way. way among other alternatives; this is one of the greatest and most important values ​​in a liberal society and it must... be at the heart of the card... make choices and be responsible for them. They are continually under the observation of a higher power that is ready to seize every single opportunity to judge them and hold them accountable whenever the conditions of wrongful conduct are met. This power and the way it controls everything could be described as a “democratic dictatorship,” in which a person – in our case, an organism – imposes duties on people and forces them to obey. But if we look more closely at the situation, if there were no rules to obey, then no legal system would exist or continue to exist. It could therefore be argued that disciplinary control constitutes the effectiveness of the law. Human beings feel that they can only be free through discipline, control and power; as such, true freedom becomes unbearable. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau once said: “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains” .