Bonilla-Silva alludes to this new style of racism as “color-blind racism.” During the civil rights era and other past eras, bigotry was represented by merciless physical, verbal, and passionate beatings of minority races through activities such as Jim Crow laws and other cruel acts. However, unlike the violent forms of racism practiced years ago, this new age “color-blind racism” incorporates subtle, institutional, and seemingly non-racial practices (Bonilla-Silva). Keeping in mind the ultimate goal of countering this new type of racism in the eyes of the public, Bonilla-Silva reveals how ordinary citizens must end up being effectively included in the battle against partially blind prejudices. Through this understanding of the content, I will try to support what is intended to be hostile to extremists in today's reality and Bonilla-Silva's call for social development, along with the obligations and good commitments that merge with both. Bonilla-Silva proposes that a noteworthy change, from non-racists to anti-racists, must happen all together for the bigotry of the blind to diminish in the eyes of the public. Bonilla-Silva wants us to understand that being hostile to supremacists begins with understanding the institutional way of dealing with racial issues, and tolerating this position includes taking responsibility for one's own inadvertent interest in these practices (Bonilla-Silva). Case in point, many white Americans gain extraordinary benefits in terms of education, job opportunities, social connections, and from there the sky is the limit. While these benefits absolutely impact whites, they also help reinforce the racial divide that exists in the United States today. In Bonilla-Silva's eyes, if white society does not recognize the hidden benefits it gets and continues to move forward
tags